An empty tomb and a bodily resurrection: why it matters

IMAGE: CNS/Bob Roller

By Mark Pattison

WASHINGTON
(CNS) — Catholics
and other Christians have grown up believing in the Resurrection, but the
Apostles themselves were among the first who were skeptical that Jesus arose from the dead.

They didn’t
believe it at first when they were told by the women who had come to anoint the
crucified Jesus’ body but instead found an empty tomb.

“To
be fair, you can say the men didn’t believe the women, but who could believe
that story? Let’s be fair to the men. They would have to see for themselves,”
said James Papandrea, a Catholic who is associate professor of church history
at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in the Chicago suburb of Evanston,
Illinois.

“I
think anyone would want to see for themselves. We believe what we see, we believe
our senses, and it’s only natural that if somebody says the Lord is alive and
you knew he was dead, you’d say, ‘Show me.’ The disciples, even after all of
Jesus’ teachings and all his hints about death and resurrection, they seem not
to have expected him to rise from the dead. They automatically went into
skeptic mode. We have Peter and John running to the empty tomb, to see that it’s
empty,” Papandrea said.

“For
believers, the significance of the tomb is that when Christians were talking about
the Resurrection, they weren’t just claiming Jesus’ soul went to heaven. Or
that Jesus lives on in our heart,” said Brant Pitre, a Scripture professor
at Notre Dame Seminary in New Orleans. “They’re saying something happened
to Jesus’ corpse, Jesus’ body. That’s the other essential story of the Resurrection.”

Some
skeptics, Pitre told Catholic News Service in an April 11 telephone interview,
talk about the concept of life after death as being just “the immortality of
Jesus’ soul. They would have said that about anybody in the Old Testament.”

That is
what makes the Resurrection not just different, but unique, according to Pitre,
author of “The Case for Jesus.”

“The
empty tomb is a necessary condition for the Resurrection, but it’s not
sufficient,” Pitre said. The other element is Jesus’ appearances to the
Apostles. “They needed to see in the flesh that he was alive again in his
body, but in a transformed and glorified state,” he added, citing the
account in Chapter 24 of St. Luke’s Gospel in which the Apostles initially think “they saw a
spirit — which shows you the Apostles believed in ghosts.” But Jesus
tells them, “Look at my hands and my feet,” which had been pierced
with nails when he was crucified, “for a spirit does not have flesh and bones,
but I have.”

Even
though the Apostles — even doubting Thomas — came to believe, it was not easy
to convince others. “One of the things skeptics will say: ‘The Apostles
were simple fishermen. They would believe anything, out of their simplicity,'”
Pitre said.

The case even holds true for the women who found the empty tomb. “In the first
century A.D., the testimony of women in a courtroom was not considered reliable,”
Pitre said, adding that for more believability, “you’d want the chief
priest to find the (empty) tomb.” As Papandrea told CNS, “If
something is in the Gospels, it’s in there for a reason. If they were ashamed
of the fact that the women were the first ones to find the tomb, they could
have easily left it out.”

The
Apostles at first “met with opposition, mockery and even doubt on the part
of the disciples,” Pitre said. “Even as Christianity spread throughout
the Roman Empire, the Resurrection was one of the stumbling blocks,” he
added, noting that St. Paul preaching about Christ in Athens to the Greeks had his
audience “until he says Christ was raised from the dead. They mock him.
It’s impossible; even ancient people knew that dead people stayed dead.”

“Many
of us have the advantage where it’s normal to believe in the Resurrection,”
said Papandrea, whose books include “Handed Down: The Catholic Faith of
the Early Christians.” “We grew up and our parents believed it, and
why wouldn’t we?”

He
added that popular culture now holds up many Christ figures. “If you watch
the superhero movies, they make liberal use of Christian themes, death and
resurrection. These themes recur, but they also use themes from Greek and Roman
mythology, Nordic mythology, as if they have equal cultural value. A lot of
people treat the story of the Passion and Resurrection of Christ as just one
more myth.”

The real
difference about Jesus and superheroes, according to Papandrea, is that “the
resurrection of Christ is not something that happened on top of Mount Olympus
before time, but God broke into time.”

The bromide
that “you can’t have Easter Sunday without Good Friday” is true as
far as it goes, but “it would be just as valid to wear a little gold empty
tomb around your neck,” Papandrea said, noting how Protestants tend to
wear a cross rather than a crucifix “because they know Jesus didn’t stay
on the cross. Both make perfect theological sense.”

“Without
Easter Sunday,” Pitre said, “Good Friday would just be one more
tragic death, one more tragic execution of one more poor Jewish man crushed by
the Roman Empire. Easter Sunday is the vindication of what happened on Good
Friday — the atoning death of the son of God for the whole world.”

– – –

Follow Pattison on Twitter: @MeMarkPattison.

– – –

Copyright © 2017 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. www.catholicnews.com. All rights reserved. Republishing or redistributing of CNS content, including by framing or similar means without prior permission, is prohibited. You may link to stories on our public site. This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To request permission for republishing or redistributing of CNS content, please contact permissions at cns@catholicnews.com.

Original Article